I think a lot of the problem is not necessarily a technical issue, meaning
I am not sure that tooling will solve the problem, but it is more of a
social problem.
I think the problem is making sure that items are triaged and placed into
peoples workflow sooner would solve this problem but I also ap
On 07/01/2020 13:29, Johann Hofmann wrote:
/For disabling tests, review from the test author, triage owner or a
component peer is required. If they do not respond within 2? business
days or if the frequency is higher than x, the test may be disabled
without their consent, but the triage own
On 09/01/2020 10:46, David Burns wrote:
I think a lot of the problem is not necessarily a technical issue,
meaning I am not sure that tooling will solve the problem, but it is
more of a social problem.
To exapnd a little on this; we've had various attempts at making
disabled tests more visibl
Thanks Johann. I agree it is important that we try to fix tests that have
been disabled. I think the sheriffs usually needinfo the triage owner
before/when disabling a test; I'm disappointed to hear that isn't happening
consistently.
However, I'd prefer not to change the review process for the dis
On 1/8/20 12:50 PM, Geoffrey Brown wrote:
Instead of changing the reviewers, how about:
- we remind the sheriffs to needinfo
- #intermittent-reviewers check that needinfo is in place when
reviewing disabling patches.
To try and help address the visibility issue, we could also make
searchfox
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 10:38 AM Geoffrey Brown wrote:
> It might be helpful if we explicitly consider some special cases. If the
> sheriffs have needinfo'd for "needswork" and that needinfo has been
> cleared, do we want to set needinfo again when disabling? Always? If the
> triage owner has a h
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 10:38 AM James Graham wrote:
> So in addition to the specific changes for intermittent handling, can we
> document how one nominates a bug for retriage in general (or point me at
> those docs if they already exist)
My understanding is that clearing the "priority" field is
7 matches
Mail list logo
