Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0

2012-10-15 Thread Justin Dolske
On 10/15/12 9:57 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: [...] But no matter what, this is unacceptable. If you can't be civil, please just don't say anything. Agreed. In such public discourse, civility and respect should be the norm. Justin ___ dev-platform mail

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0

2012-10-15 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 10/15/12 10:28 AM, alexander.alis...@gmail.com wrote: > " Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can > be packaged in WOFF format for Web use." > > anybody else see problems here. No, explain? > i think Mozilla's Jonathan Kew, needs to stick this where it does not shin

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0

2012-10-15 Thread Jonathan Kew
On 15/10/12 15:28, alexander.alis...@gmail.com wrote: " Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can be packaged in WOFF format for Web use." anybody else see problems here. W3C its main goal is to open standards right ? No, I don't see a problem there. WOFF *is* a

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0

2012-10-15 Thread alexander . alisani
" Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can be packaged in WOFF format for Web use." anybody else see problems here. W3C its main goal is to open standards right ? i think Mozilla's Jonathan Kew, needs to stick this where it does not shine