Re: Standards side of VR

2014-04-16 Thread Vladimir Vukicevic
Yep, my plan was to to not let this get beyond Nightly, maybe Aurora, but not further until the functionality and standards were firmer. - Vlad On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Ehsan Akhgari > wrote: > > I think a great way to de

Re: Standards side of VR

2014-04-16 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > I think a great way to deal with that is to keep features on the beta > channel and continue to make breaking changes to them before we feel ready > to ship them. The reality is that once we ship an API our ability to make > any backwards in

Re: Standards side of VR

2014-04-16 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2014-04-16, 11:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Andreas Gal wrote: Innovation happens all over the place, and we iterate towards a stable, standardized point after innovation happened. One of the problems we face with iterating towards that standardized pl

Standards side of VR

2014-04-16 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Andreas Gal wrote: > Innovation happens all over the place, and we iterate towards a stable, > standardized point after innovation happened. One of the problems we face with iterating towards that standardized platform is legacy. https://hsivonen.fi/vendor-prefi