JoeS wrote:
Yes, but only if you know that default policies have been violated.
Er... you can set up policies even if nothing has been violated.
I think at least an alert should be done here
So a site can go into an endless alert loop by violating a security policy in a
setInterval? No, t
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
JoeS wrote:
Unfortunately, "this does not work" equates to "this software is not
capable" for most users. Let the user know when pref controlled
capabilities are violated at least.
Feel free to suggest UI for this. I don't see a good option yet.
http://piro.sakura.ne.jp
JoeS wrote:
Unfortunately, "this does not work" equates to "this software is not
capable" for most users. Let the user know when pref controlled
capabilities are violated at least.
Feel free to suggest UI for this. I don't see a good option yet.
How far do you have to dig to find that capabi
Doug Ludy wrote:
> Thanks for checking this out so it could get fixed. Always some risk
> involved in sticking my neck out and saying, "Hey, this isn't working."
> Now seems to work fine except that this group seems to top-post whereas
> the previous security group bottom-posted.Doug Ludy
Oh
