Re: Registerfly

2007-03-02 Thread Gervase Markham
Duane wrote: Shouldn't Geotrust/Comodo's CPS cover all these kinds of questions? If not they are in breach and they should have direct obligations to Mozilla etc... Geotrust's documents are here: http://www.geotrust.com/resources/repository/legal.asp I checked the Reseller Agreement -

Re: Proposal for Mozilla CA policy extension

2007-03-02 Thread Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Gerv, thank you for the useful objections in this mail! Seriously - I mean it! You've touched a few points (some of it was already discussed, but never mind), which require either a good answer or some improvement... Gervase Markham wrote: You misunderstand my concern - I apologise for not

Re: Registerfly

2007-03-02 Thread Nelson Bolyard
Gervase Markham wrote: Nelson Bolyard wrote: Is FlySSL acting as a Registration Authority (RA) for Geotrust/Comodo? I don't think so; but how would I tell? Is the only way to tell by asking Geotrust and Comodo? That probably the best way. Or is there something that has to be in the

Re: Proposal for Mozilla CA policy extension

2007-03-02 Thread Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Gervase Markham wrote: Right. But if I promise you a pony, it doesn't mean you'll get one. Sure, but if a false promise might have some consequences, you'll think about it twice, if you it's worth promising me a pony, if in fact it is a donkey ;-) There's a fine line to walk between