Re: The need to improve HSTS (etc.) preloading based on our implementation experience

2013-09-18 Thread Paul van Brouwershaven
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 17/09/13 15:18, a...@google.com wrote: > > We also have a number of domains ("gmail.com", "googlemail.com" etc) > > which require SNI to serve the correct certificate > > Change of topic: that's really interesting. You are using SNI in

Re: The need to improve HSTS (etc.) preloading based on our implementation experience

2013-09-18 Thread Gervase Markham
On 17/09/13 15:18, a...@google.com wrote: > On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 4:58:28 AM UTC-4, Gervase Markham > wrote: >> Can we work out what those requirements are by studying the >> pinning configuration for google.com and its subdomains in Chrome? > > There are two different things that I fear

Re: Restricting privileged internal pages from chrome or about URIs with Content Security Policy

2013-09-18 Thread Frederik Braun
On 17.09.2013 09:38, Frederik Braun wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking.. Should there be a way to protect us from Cross-Zone > Scripting (i.e. somebody XSSing privileged pages and thus being able to > execute arbitrary commands) by applying CSP to internal pages? This was already filed in 2012 as ht