On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Sid Stamm wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 02:14 AM, Michael Coates wrote:
> > I'm very curious to hear your thoughts on the intended scope of this
> > list. Do you consider this list for discussions just on security
> > elements impacting Firefox? Or would you expect secu
On 09/17/2013 02:14 AM, Michael Coates wrote:
> I'm very curious to hear your thoughts on the intended scope of this
> list. Do you consider this list for discussions just on security
> elements impacting Firefox? Or would you expect security discussion on
> other Mozilla initiatives to be discusse
I don't want to get you started but look:
From your own site (!! probably a mistake in the link)
https://www.financialcryptography.com/ :-) or https://iang.org/
And maybe when you have time http://www.ianonym.com where it's explained
why you might not trust SSL/TLS
But I don't want to debat
On 23/09/13 12:16 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
Le 23/09/2013 10:42, ianG a écrit :
And yes, once HTTPS is indicated on the original request, it has to
maintain SSL/TLS protection across the lot, otherwise the security
claim is broken.
That's not the case already,
I agree. The situation is tha
