On 10/5/2013 4:00 PM, farr...@furcadia.com wrote:
> Well, I was very disappointed not to find any discussion here of the
> issues and challenges that W3C's decision on DRM for HTML5 would
> bring for security.
>
> I sort of expected people to be all over that here, when I saw the
> group name.
Th
The fact of having SSL/TLS inside ws is of course OK for me, that's what
I am doing too, but let's say I am against it (which is not the case) I
would argue that the issue remains the same: why should it be allowed to
work with "insecure" certificates while SSL/TLS on top of ws don't allow
it,