eader
are present in /an HTTP response/..."
So does that mean that that "Policy Refinements with Multiple Headers" doesn't
apply to the scenario in this message? Or is "policy refinement" intended to
apply in the above case (and similar ones)?
thanks,
=JeffH
___
dev-security mailing list
dev-security@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
Subject: Re: [TLS] fyi: paper on compelled, certificate creation attack and
applicable appliance
From: Adam Langley
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:57:47 -0400 (10:57 PDT)
To: Yoav Nir
Cc: Peter Gutmann ,
"cer...@ietf.org" , "t...@ietf.org" ,
"jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com"
O
Of possible interest to dev-security@lists.mozilla.org denizens...
[ note also that NoScript implements the (draft) STS spec as of version
1.9.8.9 ]
--- Forwarded Message
Date:Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:00:50 -0700
From:=JeffH
To: public-weba...@w3.org
cc: Jeff Hodges
