"Nelson Bolyard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Throughout the lifetime of mozilla browsers, there have been innumerable
> web
> sites that worked with IE but not mozilla, because those web sites'
> content
> depended on IE behavior, and were not testing with any
"Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mele wrote:
>> The microsoft.ipsos.com is on rackspace.com which is another Microsoft
>> partner. Firefox should not bork at this Microsoft partner site. The
>> certs
"Nelson Bolyard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Melelina wrote:
>
>> The cert is issued to www.microsoft.ipsos.com by Verisign.
>
> Or it appears to be.
>
>> I want to use Fx at Microsoft sites and I am very tired of Fx problems
>> with
>> Microsoft certs
>
> But y
en also. There are more than the two I listed though...I just can't
think of them right now. I believe mostly on technet.
I hope this is half way coherent...I must get some sleep.
"Frank Hecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mele wrote:
I have tried to delete a root cert from Fx and have found that the cert
comes back and appears FULLY FUNCTIONAL rather than being disabled. So, I
don't understand your statement.
I would like to ask why are there root certs for Fx that cannot be verified
because, according to Fx, the issuer is
