On 7/23/09 11:25 AM, Bil Corry wrote:
> Sid Stamm wrote on 7/23/2009 11:41 AM:
>> On 7/23/09 9:36 AM, Bil Corry wrote:
>>> And that section conflicts with what is said earlier in the document,
>>> specifically:
>>> "When multiple instances of the X-Content-SecurityPolicy HTTP header are
>>> pres
Sid Stamm wrote on 7/23/2009 11:41 AM:
> On 7/23/09 9:36 AM, Bil Corry wrote:
>> And that section conflicts with what is said earlier in the document,
>> specifically:
>> "When multiple instances of the X-Content-SecurityPolicy HTTP header are
>> present in an HTTP response, the intersection of
On 7/23/09 9:36 AM, Bil Corry wrote:
> Under "Policy Refinements with a Multiply-Specified Header" there is a
> misspelling of "X-Content-SecurityPolicy".
Fixed.
> And that section conflicts with what is said earlier in the document,
> specifically:
> "When multiple instances of the X-Content-Se
Daniel Veditz wrote on 7/23/2009 10:32 AM:
> Sid has updated the Content Security Policy spec to address some of the
> issues discussed here. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/CSP/Spec
Under "Policy Refinements with a Multiply-Specified Header" there is a
misspelling of "X-Content-SecurityPolicy
Sid has updated the Content Security Policy spec to address some of the
issues discussed here. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/CSP/Spec
You can see the issues we've been tracking and the resolutions at the
Talk page: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Talk:Security/CSP/Spec
There are still a few open iss
