Bil Corry wrote on 12/16/2008 6:55 PM:
> One option I'm considering is doing as you suggest, writing an entire
> cookie spec as it exists now, then add the features to cookies
> necessary to provide integrity and privacy. I spoke with Ian
> Hickson, he said IETF is the proper place for this work,
Jonas Sicking wrote on 12/16/2008 6:05 PM:
> Out of curiosity, what do you want to specify beyond what XMLHttpRequest
> and HTML5 specifies?
HTML5 only contains a disclaimer:
-
This specification does not define what makes an HTTP-only cookie, and at the
time of publication the editor is no
Bil Corry wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote on 12/16/2008 4:32 PM:
Bil Corry wrote:
There's a group of us working on creating a spec for HTTPOnly
cookies. We have a draft of the HTTPOnly scope available to review:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dxxqgkd_0cvcqhsdw
If you have an active interes
Jonas Sicking wrote on 12/16/2008 4:32 PM:
> Bil Corry wrote:
>> There's a group of us working on creating a spec for HTTPOnly
>> cookies. We have a draft of the HTTPOnly scope available to review:
>>
>> http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dxxqgkd_0cvcqhsdw
>>
>> If you have an active interest
Bil Corry wrote:
There's a group of us working on creating a spec for HTTPOnly cookies. We have
a draft of the HTTPOnly scope available to review:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dxxqgkd_0cvcqhsdw
If you have an active interest in participating, our list is here:
http://gro
Stefanos Harhalakis wrote on 12/12/2008 1:49 PM:
> My personal opinion is that any IETF related conversation regarding this
> issue
> should happen at ietf-http-wg list (unless a new WG is created).
As you point out, I did post to ietf-http-wg and the feedback I received was
that someone shoul
l#a16117176
http://www.nabble.com/HTTPOnly-Cookies-Specification-to20611621.html#a20611621
My personal opinion is that any IETF related conversation regarding this issue
should happen at ietf-http-wg list (unless a new WG is created). Otherway it
should be moved to the general purpose apps-discu
Gervase Markham wrote on 12/12/2008 11:23 AM:
> Bil Corry wrote:
>> There's a group of us working on creating a spec for HTTPOnly cookies.
>
> This isn't being done by WHAT-WG, then?
>
>> If you have an active interest in participating, our list is here:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/grou
Bil Corry wrote:
> There's a group of us working on creating a spec for HTTPOnly cookies.
This isn't being done by WHAT-WG, then?
> If you have an active interest in participating, our list is here:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/ietf-httponly-wg
Is this an official IETF group? It se
There's a group of us working on creating a spec for HTTPOnly cookies. We have
a draft of the HTTPOnly scope available to review:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dxxqgkd_0cvcqhsdw
If you have an active interest in participating, our list is here:
http://groups.google.com/grou
10 matches
Mail list logo
