Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-30 Thread Jim Straus
dia.org/wiki/Emergency_telephone_number) >>> >>> >>> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Lucas Adamski >>> Sender: dev-b2g-bounces+mikeh=mozilla.com@lists.mozilla.org

Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-30 Thread Lucas Adamski
kipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_telephone_number) >> >> >> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: Lucas Adamski >> Sender: dev-b2g-bounces+mikeh=mozilla.com@lists.mozilla.orgDate: Sun, 29 Apr >

Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-30 Thread Jim Straus
one_number) > > > Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry > > -Original Message- > From: Lucas Adamski > Sender: dev-b2g-bounces+mikeh=mozilla.com@lists.mozilla.orgDate: Sun, 29 Apr > 2012 21:20:49 > To: > Cc: ; ; dev-b2g > mailing list >

Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-30 Thread Mike Habicher
Message- From: Lucas Adamski Sender: dev-b2g-bounces+mikeh=mozilla.com@lists.mozilla.orgDate: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:20:49 To: Cc: ; ; dev-b2g mailing list Subject: Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony Updated proposal: Name of API: Web Telephony References: https:

Re: WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-29 Thread Lucas Adamski
Updated proposal: Name of API: Web Telephony References: https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/WebTelephony *B2G Meta telephony bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699235 *Web Telephony meta bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674726 Brief purpose of API: Make and receive p

Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-24 Thread Randell Jesup
>Some followup issues that came up in conversation: > >1. There is a regulatory frame around E-911 that we need to understand. > Do we need to indicate, through the API, that a device can be used > for 911 calls but not other calls? And don't forget that the regulatory issues are quite diffe

Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-24 Thread Randell Jesup
>Some followup issues that came up in conversation: > >1. There is a regulatory frame around E-911 that we need to understand. > Do we need to indicate, through the API, that a device can be used > for 911 calls but not other calls? And don't forget that the regulatory issues are quite diffe

Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-17 Thread Randell Jesup
[ Reposting via mail interface because attempts to cross-post responses in News appeared to cause my message to end up in approval queues for the relevant mail lists - and no one appears to have approved them, at least not in security and B2G ] >Some followup issues that came up in conversatio

Re: [b2g] WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-13 Thread Mike Hanson
Some followup issues that came up in conversation: 1. There is a regulatory frame around E-911 that we need to understand. Do we need to indicate, through the API, that a device can be used for 911 calls but not other calls? 2. There are two distinct scenarios hidden in the use cases - one is

WebAPI Security Discussion: Web Telephony

2012-04-11 Thread Lucas Adamski
Name of API: Web Telephony References: https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/WebTelephony *B2G Meta telephony bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699235 *Web Telephony meta bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674726 Brief purpose of API: Make and receive phone calls General