On 11/12/13 11:31 AM, fhw...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a couple good points here, starting with hard-fail. Why is it
not already turned on by default? What is the argument against it?
OCSP responders are not yet reliable enough for us to do hard fail.
This is old news:
http://news.netcraft.c
On 11/13/13 4:48 AM, wos...@gmail.com wrote:
Very thanks to Mr Erwann Abalea’s comments.
I am very sorry that we don’t update the related document in Mozilla bugzilla
in time. My company changed the company name from “WoSign eCommerce Services
Limited” to “WoSign CA Limited” at Sept 10th, so we
Phillip Hallam-Baker a écrit :
also likely to brick a large
number of cell phones as far as online commerce goes.
Which smart phone OS would you expect not to support sha-256 ?
It's likely that any that doesn't 3 years from now will have enough
security holes that it'd not be very reasonnable
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Jan Schejbal wrote:
> Am 2013-11-13 13:47, schrieb Gervase Markham:
> > We could update our program requirements to be identical to theirs, but
> > the effect on actual CA operations would be fairly small, I fancy -
> > because they are all doing it anyway. Is that
Am 2013-11-13 13:47, schrieb Gervase Markham:
> We could update our program requirements to be identical to theirs, but
> the effect on actual CA operations would be fairly small, I fancy -
> because they are all doing it anyway. Is that what you are suggesting,
> or something else?
Wouldn't it ma
Very thanks to Mr Erwann Abalea’s comments.
I am very sorry that we don’t update the related document in Mozilla bugzilla
in time. My company changed the company name from “WoSign eCommerce Services
Limited” to “WoSign CA Limited” at Sept 10th, so we resigned CA1 and CA2 at
Sep.14th and setup th
On 12/11/13 23:20, Daniel Veditz wrote:
> This is a bandwagon we ought to hop on. See
> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/advisory/2880823
Microsoft were kind enough to make us aware of this move in advance. We
are certainly supportive.
Here's one bit of hopping:
http://blog.gerv.net/2
7 matches
Mail list logo
