David E. Ross a écrit :
With a redacted audit report, the presumption
should be that hidden negative information exists that would disqualify
the certification authority from having its root certificate in the NSS
database if such information were disclosed.
any redaction would imply the
On 8/27/2014 7:11 AM, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
David E. Ross a écrit :
With a redacted audit report, the presumption
should be that hidden negative information exists that would disqualify
the certification authority from having its root certificate in the NSS
database if such information
On 8/27/14, 7:11 AM, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
David E. Ross a écrit :
With a redacted audit report, the presumption
should be that hidden negative information exists that would disqualify
the certification authority from having its root certificate in the NSS
database if such information
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 09:42:13AM +0800, Man Ho (Certizen) wrote:
Concerning about a list of BRs that the CA is still working to conform
with, I don't think CAs will agree to publish in public for security
reason and also because of business sensitivity. I think some CAs don't
even want to
4 matches
Mail list logo
