Re: Re: Re: KIR S.A. Root Inclusion Request

2014-10-06 Thread Erwann Abalea
Bonsoir, Le lundi 6 octobre 2014 15:55:24 UTC+2, Certificates a écrit : > Thank you for your clarifications. We analysed it, and we add Authority > Key Identifier extension to our CRLs. As it it mentioned in s. 5.2.1 RFC > 5280 "this extension is especially useful where an issuer has more than

ODP: Re: Re: KIR S.A. Root Inclusion Request

2014-10-06 Thread Certificates
Hi Erwann, Thank you for your clarifications. We analysed it, and we add Authority Key Identifier extension to our CRLs. As it it mentioned in s. 5.2.1 RFC 5280 “this extension is especially useful where an issuer has more than one signing key, either due to multiple concurrent key pairs or due

Re: Client certs

2014-10-06 Thread Gervase Markham
On 06/10/14 14:13, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > I have the configurator running for Windows Live Mail and I will add > outlook soon. But I abandoned the attempt to do T-bird because I just > can't get the dev system running on my Windows box despite more than a > day trying. The documentation is i

Re: Client certs

2014-10-06 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > A question which occurred to me, and I thought I'd put before an > audience of the wise: > > * What advantages, if any, do client certs have over number-sequence > widgets such as e.g. the HSBC Secure Key, used with SSL? > > http://www.hs

Re: Client certs

2014-10-06 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > There is so much usability failure in smart cards that I've > worked quite hard to keep them out of scope of W3C Web Crypto WG Thank you. > (which, > unfortunately, looks like that may fail in the rechartering and all hell > will break lose).