Thanks to all of you who reviewed and commented on this request from
CFCA to include the “CFCA EV ROOT” root certificate, turn on the
websites trust bit, and enable EV treatment.
I am closing this discussion, and I will recommend approval in the bug.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?i
On 2015-02-04 14:55, Man Ho (Certizen) wrote:
But making a statement in CP/CPS means that CA "has already
complied" with the "latest version" of BRs. In other words, CA has
already complied with all potential changes of BRs at all time. Such
statement could be a false statement when the "latest v
On 2/4/2015 6:08 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> They are not refusing to comply, they
> just want to change the location of the compliance statement.
In practice, Webtrust BR audit report requires the CA's assertion of
compliance with BRs. It is a proper place to make the compliance
statement becau
On 28/01/15 22:49, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> I have been asked if a CA can have their Webtrust audit statement
> indicate their commitment to comply with the BRs, rather than putting
> the commitment to comply statement in the CP/CPS.
> Here are the reason:
>
> 1) We are not a member of CAB/Forum
4 matches
Mail list logo
