On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:39 PM, David Keeler dkee...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 03/19/2015 01:01 PM, Peter Bowen wrote:
Given this ratio, I find it very hard to believe that they would be
able to receive an audit report without qualifications that Mozilla
would deem unacceptable.
Maybe I'm
On Thu, March 19, 2015 4:49 pm, Peter Bowen wrote:
For example, based on what you reported and what I saw, the audit
report should at a minimum say:
E-Guven complies with the Baseline Requirements with the following
qualifications:
- Some certificates issued do not conform to 9.2.1
-
Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:01:32PM -0700, Peter Bowen wrote:
In the Pilot CT log, which includes every certificate that the Google
crawler has seen, I found 19 unexpired certificates issued by this CA.
Their subjects are as follows (using the default
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:35:20AM +0100, LuxTrust CA wrote:
Regarding issue #2 : OCSP responds good to a non-issued certificate
(serials and 00) (BR Section
13.2.6) :
LuxTrust’s OCSP application currently does not support this feature
(technical
On Tue, March 3, 2015 12:32 pm, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
All,
I have confirmed that KIR has made the changes listed below to their
CPS
and CP.
CPS:
http://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/files/doc/certification_practice_statement.pdf
CP:
5 matches
Mail list logo
