On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:50 PM, David E. Ross
wrote:
>
> According to Softpedia, Mozilla is the only organization that agreed to
> Symantec's request. Microsoft, Google, and others are holding firm on
> rejecting SHA-1 certificates. See
> <
>
On 2/23/2016 10:57 AM, Gervase Markham wrote [in part]:
> Mozilla and other browsers have been approached by Worldpay, a large
> payment processor, via Symantec, their CA. They have been transitioning
> to SHA-2 but due to an oversight have failed to do so in time for a
> portion of their
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:32:34AM -0800, douglas.beat...@gmail.com wrote:
> I hope the same courtesy is afforded to other high profile customers and
> their CA should the need arise.
Why should a requestor's profile come into it? Because they're in a better
position to make trouble if their
3 matches
Mail list logo