Re: Proposed limited exception to SHA-1 issuance

2016-02-27 Thread Eric Mill
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:50 PM, David E. Ross wrote: > > According to Softpedia, Mozilla is the only organization that agreed to > Symantec's request. Microsoft, Google, and others are holding firm on > rejecting SHA-1 certificates. See > < >

Re: Proposed limited exception to SHA-1 issuance

2016-02-27 Thread David E. Ross
On 2/23/2016 10:57 AM, Gervase Markham wrote [in part]: > Mozilla and other browsers have been approached by Worldpay, a large > payment processor, via Symantec, their CA. They have been transitioning > to SHA-2 but due to an oversight have failed to do so in time for a > portion of their

Re: Re: Proposed limited exception to SHA-1 issuance

2016-02-27 Thread Matt Palmer
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:32:34AM -0800, douglas.beat...@gmail.com wrote: > I hope the same courtesy is afforded to other high profile customers and > their CA should the need arise. Why should a requestor's profile come into it? Because they're in a better position to make trouble if their