On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:48:14AM -0700, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> In either event, the only objection to clarifying this ambiguity in the
> Forum was raised by Symantec, and as such, a ballot to correct this
> confusion has remained stalled.
It seems fairly dysfunctional if a single member of the
One small thing I noticed - the CA Hierarchy diagram the bug links to is
out of date:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8660928
At a minimum, X3 and X4 now exist:
https://letsencrypt.org/certificates/
-- Eric
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Kathleen Wilson
This request by ISRG is to include the "ISRG Root X1" root certificate, and
turn on the Websites trust bit.
Internet Security Research Group (ISRG) offers server authentication
certificates to the general public around the world.
The request is documented in the following bug:
On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 7:16:12 AM UTC-7, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> So the RFC seems to allow it to me, but a client can obviously decide
> not to do it.
I didn't say it wasn't allowed, merely that it was against the material advice
of RFC 6125
On 2016-04-20 15:48, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 10:15:16 AM UTC-7, Nick Lamb wrote:
Some more thoughts (my previous substantive comments are awaiting moderation
because I foolishly sent them before subscribing)
1. Historically other CAs in this family have issued
5 matches
Mail list logo