RE: question about DNS CAA and S/MIME certificates

> On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 2:16:14 AM UTC-4, Tim Hollebeek wrote: > > This is the point I most strongly agree with. > > > > I do not think it's at odds with the LAMPS charter for 6844-bis, > > because I do not think it's at odds with 6844. > > Updating 6844 is easy. Just define the tag and

Re: question about DNS CAA and S/MIME certificates

On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 2:16:14 AM UTC-4, Tim Hollebeek wrote: > This is the point I most strongly agree with. > > I do not think it's at odds with the LAMPS charter for 6844-bis, because I do > not think it's at odds with 6844. Updating 6844 is easy. Just define the tag and specify scope

RE: Bit encoding (AW: Policy 2.6 Proposal: Add prohibition on CA key generation to policy)

When we debated it last, my predictions were hypothetical. I wish they had remained hypothetical. -Tim From: Wayne Thayer [mailto:wtha...@mozilla.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 12:33 AM To: Tim Hollebeek ; mozilla-dev-security-policy

RE: question about DNS CAA and S/MIME certificates

This is the point I most strongly agree with. -Tim I do not think it's at odds with the LAMPS charter for 6844-bis, because I do not think it's at odds with 6844. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ dev-security-policy