Matthew Hardeman writes:
>I wonder if you've ever annoyed a taxing authority? They have far less humor
>than one might imagine.
I used to have the account name administrator@, after trying
various SQLI@ names and being somewhat disappointed that no
fireworks ensued. They were rather amused,
Matthew Hardeman writes:
>On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
>> New business enterprise name: ';UPDATE TAXRATE SET RATE = 0 WHERE NAME =
>> 'EDVIN SYSE'
>
>That's hilarious. Where I'm from they'd accuse you of attempting to hack
>them, though likely not actually
Matthew Hardeman writes:
>Banks, trade vendors, etc, tend to reject accounts with names like this.
Do they?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nzphoto/6038112443/
Peter.
___
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
*Some cas. I don’t think the 18 month requirement is a universal position and
may not even be a majority view. I think there’s other ideas that are better
and add more value than simply extending the time a company is required to
exist to get the cert.
> On May 31, 2018, at 4:40 PM, Wayne
All,
We are working towards updating the tool that we use in the CCADB to
parse PEM data and fill in the corresponding fields in the CCADB. The
new tool is in the TLS Observatory:
https://github.com/mozilla/tls-observatory
Example:
curl
On 06/01/2018 12:14 AM, Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
> wrote:
>
>>
>> New business enterprise name: ';UPDATE TAXRATE SET RATE = 0 WHERE NAME =
>> 'EDVIN SYSE'
>>
>> they have a write-up on it on
>>
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:39 PM James Burton via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
>
> This is wrong and should be changed to allow all types of legally
> incorporated company names to get certificates. I understand this
> doesn't fit any of the standard company
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
wrote:
>
> New business enterprise name: ';UPDATE TAXRATE SET RATE = 0 WHERE NAME =
> 'EDVIN SYSE'
>
> they have a write-up on it on
> https://blogg.syse.no/syse-data-og-bronnoysundregistrene/ in Norwegian,
> although you'll find
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Peter Saint-Andre via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
>
>
> We can also think of many business types (e.g., scammers) that would
> love to have names like ⒶⓅⓅⓁⒺ but that doesn't mean it's smart to issue
> certificates with such
On 05/31/2018 11:54 PM, Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy wrote:
> I wonder if you've ever annoyed a taxing authority? They have far less
> humor than one might imagine.
>
> Just because you've formed a legal entity with such a name does not mean
> that others will regard it with
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:38 PM, James Burton via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
>
> I recently incorporated the company named ";", see:
> https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/11363219. This company
> compiles with
> the both the "Companies Act 2006" and
On 5/31/18 2:38 PM, James Burton via dev-security-policy wrote:
> I posted this also on the CAB Forum validation mailing list but I think
> it's worthy of discussion on both lists.
>
>
> I recently incorporated the company named ";", see:
> https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/11363219.
I posted this also on the CAB Forum validation mailing list but I think
it's worthy of discussion on both lists.
I recently incorporated the company named ";", see:
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/11363219. This company compiles with
the both the "Companies Act 2006" and "The Company,
Hi Daymion,
I will summarise briefly my understanding of this report in case it is
wrong, if so please correct me, I apologise, and the rest of the email
is probably of no further importance:
GoDaddy integrated a linter (checking the certificates for sense) in
November 2017, and in February this
14 matches
Mail list logo
