On 01/06/2018 21:01, Wayne Thayer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:06 PM Jakob Bohm via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
Please contact the CA again, and inform them that BR 4.9.1.1 #6 requires
the CA (not some reseller) to revoke the certificate within 24
On 01/06/2018 22:39, Joanna Fox wrote:
In light of the limited visibility of WHOIS, Wayne's suggestion of "... allow anyone
to revoke by proving that they control the domain name using one of the BR 3.2.2.4
methods" is preferable as it is a bit more encompassing rather than restricting to
to
I would like to replace the old "Certificate ID" field with the
following two fields, because they are useful in different situations,
and the new field names are clear about what the values are.
SPKI SHA256
Subject + SPKI SHA256
Also, I am seeing differences in the following fields for a
Kind reminder.
Thanks!
___
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
This company only cost £10. £6 for the incorporation. £4 for sending in
NE01 form to Companies House.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 at 08:58, Jeremy Rowley via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> Punctuation differences are not enough to register a name in the us, or at
>
Punctuation differences are not enough to register a name in the us, or at
least in the jurisdictions here I’m aware of.
> On Jun 4, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Ryan Hurst via dev-security-policy
> wrote:
>
> I apologize, I originally wrote in haste and did not clearly state what I
> was suggesting.
I apologize, I originally wrote in haste and did not clearly state what I
was suggesting.
Specifically, while it is typical for a given jurisdiction (state, etc) to
require a name to be unique, it is typically not a requirement for it to
not be so unique that it can not be confused for another
7 matches
Mail list logo
