On 14/03/2020 18:53, Nick Lamb wrote:
my assumption is that at
best such a patch would be in the big pile of volunteer stuff maybe
nobody has time to look at.
Tangential: perhaps there's an aspect of phrasing here that is confusing
me, but this reads to me as suggesting we don't review/work
(For the avoidance of doubt, although I work for Mozilla, as noted on
the wiki I post in a personal capacity)
In addition to Ryan's excellent points, I wanted to briefly point out a
few things related to your survey:
On 22/09/2019 00:52, Kirk Hall wrote:
(1) *97%* of respondents agreed or
(I'm splitting the topic because at this point, continuing to discuss
the analogy doesn't have a direct bearing on the inclusion or otherwise
of DM)
Replies inline.
On 16/07/2019 23:23, Matthew Hardeman wrote:
I submit that I disagree somewhat with Gijs' suggestion that Mozilla acts
in the
On 11/07/2019 03:38, Matthew Hardeman wrote:
I used
the parallel to racism in finance because it's exceedingly well documented
that strong objective systems of risk management and decisioning led to
better overall financial outcomes AND significantly opened the door to
credit (aka trust) to
On 02/03/2019 08:45, Cynthia Revström wrote:
On 2019-03-02 01:49, George Macon via dev-security-policy wrote:
One specific question on this point: Why did the software permit setting
the approval scope to a public suffix (as defined by inclusion on the
public suffix list)? Could validation
On 05/12/2018 19:45, Wayne Thayer wrote:
..On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:58 PM dr. Sándor Szőke via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
6./
Explanation about how and why the mistakes were made or bugs introduced,
and how they avoided detection until now.
Microsec
(for the avoidance of doubt: posting in a personal capacity)
On 23/11/2018 15:24, Enrico Entschew wrote:
Timeline:
2018-11-12, 10:30 UTC Customer was contacted the first time. Customer runs an
international critical trade platform for emissions. Immediate revocation of
the certificate would
On 18/12/2017 21:54, Andrew wrote:
On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 3:09:31 PM UTC-6, Wayne Thayer wrote:
Thank you Ryan for raising this question, and to everyone who has been
contributing in a constructive manner to the discussion. A number of
excellent points have been raised on the
On 13/12/2017 14:50, Tim Shirley wrote:
I guess I’m also having a hard time appreciating how the presence of this
information is a “cost” to users who don’t care about it. For one thing, it’s
been there for years in all major browsers, so everyone has at least been
conditioned to its
On 11/08/2017 15:39, Policy Authority PKIoverheid wrote:
2. Why did DDY not implement the serial number entropy as required by the
Baseline Requirements?
3. Was this detected by the auditor? If not, why not?
ANSWER ON QUESTION 2:
DDY concluded wrongly that ballot 164 was not applicable for
10 matches
Mail list logo
