Re: StartCom issuing bogus certificates

gt;> Subject: Re: StartCom issuing bogus certificates On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:09:57PM +, Yuhong Bao via dev-security-policy wrote: > The point is that "misissuance" of example.com<http://example.com> is > harmless as they are reserved by IANA. But example.com<htt

Re: StartCom issuing bogus certificates

The point is that "misissuance" of example.com is harmless as they are reserved by IANA. From: dev-security-policy on behalf of Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy

Re: StartCom issuing bogus certificates

It would be better to use example.com and not test.com or anything like that, as that is defined by IANA as a reserved domain. From: dev-security-policy on behalf of Inigo Barreira

Re: SHA-1 collision

identical prefix, not chosen prefix. I was more interested in an SHA-1 collision ASIC. From: dev-security-policy on behalf of Adrian R. via dev-security-policy