On Tuesday, 21 January 2020 15:49:30 UTC-5, Dathan Demone wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 January 2020 14:07:49 UTC-5, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> > > One - which appears to remain valid at time of writing - is an OV
> > > certificate for "routerlogin.com" and variants, which was issued to
> > > Netge
On Tuesday, 21 January 2020 14:07:49 UTC-5, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> > One - which appears to remain valid at time of writing - is an OV
> > certificate for "routerlogin.com" and variants, which was issued to Netgear
> > by Entrust, https://crt.sh/?id=1955992027
> >
>
> Based on this tweet
> One - which appears to remain valid at time of writing - is an OV certificate
> for "routerlogin.com" and variants, which was issued to Netgear by Entrust,
> https://crt.sh/?id=1955992027
>
Based on this tweet
(https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/1219147543667453953?s=19) from
2020-01-20
On Tuesday, 21 January 2020 09:43:53 UTC-5, teg...@gmail.com wrote:
> About 24 hours ago, this gist was published to Github:
>
> https://gist.github.com/nstarke/a611a19aab433555e91c656fe1f030a9
>
> It details two publicly-trusted certificates whose private keys are present
> in publicly-availab
About 24 hours ago, this gist was published to Github:
https://gist.github.com/nstarke/a611a19aab433555e91c656fe1f030a9
It details two publicly-trusted certificates whose private keys are present in
publicly-available Netgear firmware images.
One - which appears to remain valid at time of writi
5 matches
Mail list logo
