g> wrote:
> We believe this issue has been fixed.
>
> From: Ben Wilson
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2019 2:22:45 PM
> To: Corey Bonnell; mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
> Subject: RE: Incorrect OCSP status for revoked intermediates
We believe this issue has been fixed.
From: Ben Wilson
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2019 2:22:45 PM
To: Corey Bonnell; mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: RE: Incorrect OCSP status for revoked intermediates
Thanks, Corey. As I said, we'll t
y-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Incorrect OCSP status for revoked intermediates
On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 4:09:44 PM UTC-5, Ben Wilson wrote:
> I'll look into this immediate, but have you checked to see whether
> these certificates have OCSP AIAs in them? Or did you find these by
>
8:50 AM
To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Incorrect OCSP status for revoked intermediates
Hello,
I discovered that the following Baltimore CyberTrust Root-chained
intermediates are disclosed in CCADB and are revoked via CRL, but the OCSP
responder is returning "good&q
4 matches
Mail list logo