On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 10:51:58 AM UTC-7, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 2:08:19 PM UTC-7, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> > On 12/17/15 5:34 PM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> > > The first discussion of LuxTrust's root inclusion request was here:
> > >
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:04:53 PM UTC-7, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> I've reviewed this CP/CPS set again, keeping in mind the previous comments on
> the first round of discussion, and I don't believe there's anything noted
> that should prevent this inclusion from continuing.
Thanks,
On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 1:13:38 PM UTC-7, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 9:07:33 AM UTC-7, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> > Does anyone have comments, questions, or concerns about this request from
> > LuxTrust to include the "LuxTrust Global Root 2" certificate,
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 9:07:33 AM UTC-7, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> Does anyone have comments, questions, or concerns about this request from
> LuxTrust to include the "LuxTrust Global Root 2" certificate, turn on the
> Websites trust bit, and enable EV treatment?
>
> If not, I will
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 10:51:58 AM UTC-7, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
>
> The CA has resolved the questions and concerns raised during the first
> discussion, and has provided an updated root certificate with corresponding
> updated documentation and audit statement.
>
> Please review this
On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 2:08:19 PM UTC-7, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> On 12/17/15 5:34 PM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> > The first discussion of LuxTrust's root inclusion request was here:
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/47Jz7f8E4RI/sT1wTJ2RIEMJ
> >
> >
>
> This
On 12/17/15 5:34 PM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
The first discussion of LuxTrust's root inclusion request was here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/47Jz7f8E4RI/sT1wTJ2RIEMJ
This discussion is currently on hold, because the CA would like to
request inclusion of the
Please find below our answer to the three actions items:
I) Resolve the concerns that were raised about CRL and OCSP. Also
resolve all errors listed here:
https://certificate.revocationcheck.com/www.trustme.lu
With regards to the issues raised about the OCSP application (either
raised in the
On Fri, April 24, 2015 4:58 pm, kwil...@mozilla.com wrote:
Other than the concerns that have been raised about CRL and OCSP, are
there any further questions or comments about this request from LuxTrust
to include the LuxTrust Global Root root certificate, turn on the
Websites and Code
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:35:20AM +0100, LuxTrust CA wrote:
Regarding issue #2 : OCSP responds good to a non-issued certificate
(serials and 00) (BR Section
13.2.6) :
LuxTrust’s OCSP application currently does not support this feature
(technical
After some quick test of the OCSP Service I detect the following issues related
to the conformity with CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements for the Issuance
and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates (hereinafter BR) as required by
section 12 of Mozilla CA Certificate Inclusion Policy
For clarification purposes and as described in the bug report 1060863 (see
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1060863), LuxTrust would like
to mention that the Root CA for which inclusion in Mozilla’s trust store is
requested is LuxTrust Global Root CA.
The topics raised by David
For clarification purposes and as described in the bug report 1060863 (see
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1060863), LuxTrust would like
to mention that the Root CA for which inclusion in Mozilla’s trust store is
requested is LuxTrust Global Root CA.
The topics raised by David
LuxTrust has applied to include the LuxTrust Global Root root
certificate, turn on the Websites and Code Signing trust bits, and
enable EV treatment.
LuxTrust S.A. provides PKI services for the whole economic marketplace
in Luxembourg, for both private and public organisations. LuxTrust S.A.
14 matches
Mail list logo
