Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:12:46 -0500 Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy wrote: > So I'd say feel free to ask your question there, which helps make > sure it's answered before the issue is closed. Good point. In this case Arvid has clarified that in fact the ticket now has an updated sheet which (

Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

curity-policy > > On > > Behalf Of Nick Lamb via dev-security-policy > > Sent: donderdag 11 februari 2021 19:12 > > To: dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org > > Cc: Ben Wilson > > Subject: Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for >

RE: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

cy > Sent: donderdag 11 februari 2021 19:12 > To: dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org > Cc: Ben Wilson > Subject: Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, > E46, R45 and E45 Roots > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:29:15 -0700 > Ben Wilson via de

Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:11 PM Nick Lamb via dev-security-policy < dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > I have a question (if I should write it in Bugzilla instead please say > so it is unclear to me what the correct protocol is) > While Mozilla Policy permits discussion in both, I wi

Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:29:15 -0700 Ben Wilson via dev-security-policy wrote: > All, > GlobalSign has provided a very detailed incident report in Bugzilla - > see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690807#c2. > There are a few remaining questions that still need to be answered, > so this

Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

All, GlobalSign has provided a very detailed incident report in Bugzilla - see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690807#c2. There are a few remaining questions that still need to be answered, so this email is just to keep you aware. Hopefully later this week I'll be able to come back an

Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

All, Under Step 10 of the https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Application_Process, this is notice of a "further question or concern" that has arisen concerning GlobalSign's issuance of a 1024-bit RSA certificate. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690807. GlobalSign has indicated that it wil

Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

On January 11, 2021, we began the public discussion period [Step 4 of the Mozilla Root Store CA Application Process ] for the above-referenced GlobalSign inclusion request. *Summary of Discussion and Completion of Action Items [Steps 5-8]:* Recentl

Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

This is a reminder that I will close discussion on this tomorrow. On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ben Wilson wrote: > This is to announce the beginning of the public discussion phase of the > Mozilla root CA inclusion process for GlobalSign. > > See https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Application_Proces

Re: Public Discussion of GlobalSign's CA Inclusion Request for R46, E46, R45 and E45 Roots

Hey Ben, I know discussion here has been quiet, but in light of other threads going on, I actually want to say I'm very supportive of GlobalSign's plan here, and surprised they didn't call more attention to it, because it's something to be proud of. As I understand it, and happy to be corrected i