a.org"
Subject: Re: Submission to ct-logs of the final certificate when there is
already a pre-certificate
I think (3) shouldn't be considered any different from (1) -- they're only
meaningfully different if you make a lot of assumptions about how it's stored
and transp
wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 02/04/2018 18:26, Tom Delmas wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Following the discussion on
> >>>> https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=l_
> TG2r42aQmbn72ySdqaNlBjW-xvJAqoIpJG1bH1_Q&s=5&
On 02/04/2018 18:26, Tom Delmas wrote:
>>>
>>>> Following the discussion on
>>>>
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=l_TG2r42aQmbn72ySdqaNlBjW-xvJAqoIpJG1bH1_Q&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2fcommunity%2eletsencrypt%2eorg%2ft%2fnon-logging-of-final-cer
:
Following the discussion on
https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/non-logging-of-final-certificates/58394
What is the position of Mozilla about the submission to ct-logs of the
final certificate when there is already a pre-certificate?
As it helps discover bugs (
https://twitter.com/_quirins/status
; > > Following the discussion on
> > > > https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/non-logging-of-final-certificates/58394
> > > >
> > > > What is the position of Mozilla about the submission to ct-logs of the
> > > > final certificate when there is a
t;>
>>> On 02/04/2018 18:26, Tom Delmas wrote:
>>>
>>>> Following the discussion on
>>>> https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/non-logging-of-final-cer
>>>> tificates/58394
>>>>
>>>> What is the position of Mozilla about
Mozilla about the submission to ct-logs of the
final certificate when there is already a pre-certificate?
As it helps discover bugs (
https://twitter.com/_quirins/status/979788044994834434 ), it helps
accountability of CAs and it's easily enforceable, I feel that it should
be mandatory.
If s
sition of Mozilla about the submission to ct-logs of the
> > final certificate when there is already a pre-certificate?
> >
> > As it helps discover bugs (
> > https://twitter.com/_quirins/status/979788044994834434 ), it helps
> > accountability of CAs and it's easily enfor
On 02/04/2018 18:26, Tom Delmas wrote:
Following the discussion on
https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/non-logging-of-final-certificates/58394
What is the position of Mozilla about the submission to ct-logs of the
final certificate when there is already a pre-certificate?
As it helps
ubmission to ct-logs of the
> final certificate when there is already a pre-certificate?
>
> As it helps discover bugs ( https://twitter.com/_quirins/s
> tatus/979788044994834434 ), it helps accountability of CAs and it's
> easily enfo
Following the discussion on
https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/non-logging-of-final-certificates/58394
What is the position of Mozilla about the submission to ct-logs of the
final certificate when there is already a pre-certificate?
As it helps discover bugs (
https://twitter.com/_quirins
11 matches
Mail list logo
