Re: Turn on hardfail?

2014-04-24 Thread fhw843
:39 PM To: fhw...@gmail.com; dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Turn on hardfail? I'm talking about the DoS vulnerability opened up by making a few OCSP servers a single point of failure for *many* sites. It's also not great that you have to let certificate authorities know about

Re: Turn on hardfail?

2014-04-24 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
If there was a DoS attack it would be the first and the last. OCSP is only a DoS issue for servers that don't staple. All modern servers can staple if configured to do so. Further it is only the weaker CAs that don't have DoS proof OCSP service. So if there was a DoS attack we would see a sudden

Re: Turn on hardfail?

2014-04-21 Thread Daniel Micay
requires a DoS of the OCSP server. These servers are often pretty flaky too. I am seeing people suggest that a CA be dropped from the root for their alleged improper handling of revocation. If revocation matters so much that it must be enforced on CAs then it matters enough to turn on hardfail

Re: Turn on hardfail?

2014-04-21 Thread Peter Eckersley
suggest that a CA be dropped from the root for their alleged improper handling of revocation. If revocation matters so much that it must be enforced on CAs then it matters enough to turn on hardfail for a major server coding error. Every platform is vulnerable because the server key can