Re: Continue discussion about "Define actions or practices that bar a company from being a trusted CA (#19)"

2016-12-01 Thread Gervase Markham
On 01/12/16 15:50, Han Yuwei wrote: > Ok. Could you tell me when we can discuss it? After 2.4 release? Once we ship 2.4, we will then have a discussion about how best to handle the remaining issues. That doesn't mean we will necessarily discuss this straight away; it depends on the state of

Re: Continue discussion about "Define actions or practices that bar a company from being a trusted CA (#19)"

2016-12-01 Thread Han Yuwei
在 2016年12月1日星期四 UTC+8下午3:14:14,Gervase Markham写道: > On 30/11/16 23:08, Han Yuwei wrote: > > In https://github.com/mozilla/pkipolicy/issues/19 Gerv talked about > > what shouldn't CA do but the discussion thread listed didn't > > continue. > > That issue is not currently targetted for 2.4. In the

Re: Policy 2.4 Proposal: Add CC-0 license to policy

2016-12-01 Thread Gervase Markham
On 01/12/16 08:06, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> Presumably you are proposing alternative text like: >> >> "This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Zero license." > > Yes. The particular text was chosen because of: https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/headers/ which is what code in the Mozilla tree

Re: Policy 2.4 Proposal: Add CC-0 license to policy

2016-12-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:16:56AM +, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 30/11/16 21:58, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >> This would involve adding a footer: > >> > >> Any copyright in this document is dedicated to the Public > >> Domain. > >> > >> with the link being to > >>