Clearly there has to be a way for key compromises to be remedied. If I've been following this pinning discussion correctly it seems unavoidable that we will have cases requiring certs to be issued on the
On 09/10/17 18:04, Matthew Hardeman wrote:
> Echoing Mr. Lamb's concern, I would think that defining two
> "important notice role/mailing list recipient addresses" and always
> sending important notices to both. This would allow for a mailing
> list on CA internal infrastructure as well as one on
2 matches
Mail list logo
