On 5/6/20 5:19 AM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
Should we be creating CA incidents for repeats? I wasn’t sure if this was
just an administrative hiccup on the Mozilla side in processing the case,
or if this is a matter where the CA is not disclosing in a timely fashion.
CAs directly add audit
> I have drafted a potential CA Communication and survey, and will greatly
> appreciate your input on it.
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Communications#May_2020_CA_Communication
>
> Direct link to read-only copy of the draft survey:
>
In trying to validate the problem reporting e-mail address for
https://crt.sh/?id=657220608, I grovelled through the CCADB CSV-o'-Doom
(freshly downloaded for that "new CSV" smell ), and the CPS link
therein refers to http://grca.nat.gov.tw/download/GPKI_CP_eng_v1.7.pdf
which, at the time of
This has happened twice now, with two different CAs, so I'm going to raise
it as a general issue.
I've had one CA reject e-mails because the HELO name wasn't to their liking
(which I was able to fix). The other, which has just started happening now,
is utterly inscrutible -- "550 Administrative
4 matches
Mail list logo
