Would it be unreasonable to also consider publishing, as an "easy to use"
list, that set of only those anchors which are currently trusted in the
program and for which no exceptional in-product policy enforcement is
imposed? (TLD constraints, provisional distrusts, etc.)
The lazier implementers
On 2020-10-06 23:47, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
All,
I've been asked to publish Mozilla's root store in a way that is easy to
consume by downstreams, so I have added the following to
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Included_Certificates
CCADB Data Usage Terms
On 10/6/20 7:09 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
It seems like there should be a link to
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/FAQ#Can_I_use_Mozilla.27s_set_of_CA_certificates.3F
there
I added that link to https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Included_Certificates
Thanks,
Kathleen
On 10/7/20 9:30 AM, Matthew Hardeman wrote:
Would it be unreasonable to also consider publishing, as an "easy to use"
list, that set of only those anchors which are currently trusted in the
program and for which no exceptional in-product policy enforcement is
imposed? (TLD constraints,
4 matches
Mail list logo