Re: Summary of Camerfirma's Compliance Issues

2021-01-22 Thread Watson Ladd via dev-security-policy
On Friday, January 22, 2021 at 10:01:22 AM UTC-8, Ramiro Muñoz wrote: > El miércoles, 20 de enero de 2021 a las 5:04:27 UTC+1, Matt Palmer escribió: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:28:17AM -0800, Ramiro Muñoz via > > dev-security-policy wrote: > > > Camerfirma is not the member with the highest

Re: Mozilla's Response to Camerfirma's Compliance Issues

2021-01-27 Thread Watson Ladd via dev-security-policy
On Monday, January 25, 2021 at 9:21:53 PM UTC-8, Ben Wilson wrote: > Dear All, > > We appreciate your comments and participation in the discussion about the > Summary of Camerfirma's Compliance Issues, > https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Camerfirma_Issues. > > Mozilla has not yet made a decision

Re: Summary of Camerfirma's Compliance Issues

2021-01-24 Thread Watson Ladd via dev-security-policy
On Sunday, January 24, 2021 at 11:58:29 AM UTC-8, Ramiro Muñoz wrote: > > Thanks everyone for your valuable contribution to the discussion. We’ve > prepared a throughful Remediation Plan that addresses all areas of > improvement emerged both in this public discussion as well as direct contacts

Re: Policy 2.7.1: MRSP Issue #192: Require information about auditor qualifications in the audit report

2021-02-15 Thread Watson Ladd via dev-security-policy
On Monday, February 15, 2021 at 3:07:12 PM UTC-8, Jeff Ward wrote: > On Monday, February 15, 2021 at 4:11:15 PM UTC-6, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > > Apologies for belaboring the point, but I think we might be talking past > > eachother. > > > > You originally stated “The only place I am aware that