The current proposed draft of changes is at
https://github.com/BenWilson-Mozilla/pkipolicy/commit/443b4c5d5155942a216322480f3a6a273ea2
Right now, I'm considering having subsection of MRSP section 3.1.4 say,
"the CA locations that were or were not audited" - with a hyperlink to
Thanks, Jeff. These are useful comments, and I will take them into
consideration in revising our proposal.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:38 AM Jeff Ward via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 8:38:05 AM UTC-6, Jeff Ward wrote:
> > On
On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 8:38:05 AM UTC-6, Jeff Ward wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 2:41:10 PM UTC-6, Ben Wilson wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > This email is part of the discussion for the next version of the Mozilla
> > Root Store Policy (MSRP), version 2.7.1, to be published during
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 2:41:10 PM UTC-6, Ben Wilson wrote:
> All,
>
> This email is part of the discussion for the next version of the Mozilla
> Root Store Policy (MSRP), version 2.7.1, to be published during of Q1-2021.
>
> For audit delays, we currently require that audit
All,
This email is part of the discussion for the next version of the Mozilla
Root Store Policy (MSRP), version 2.7.1, to be published during of Q1-2021.
For audit delays, we currently require that audit statements disclose the
locations that were and were not audited, but that requirement has
5 matches
Mail list logo
