Bit late to the party, but I think there are a couple of core issues
causing this debate:
There are actually two kinds of trust involved. First is the trust to not
botnet the CI, basically
everyone here (at least everyone with try) has that. But that's not the
actual one being discussed
here. The
My understanding is that we want to be able to use Firefox OS as a
testcase for Servo, so it seems important to maintain compatibility with
Gecko's Browser API.
On 2015-11-12 10:05 AM, Paul Rouget wrote:
to dev-servo. dev-platform cc'ed.
context: browser.html + servo
There are some changes w
to dev-servo. dev-platform cc'ed.
context: browser.html + servo
There are some changes we'd like to make to the Browser API.
At least, we'd like to always use event.detail instead of
event.details (because DOM events use detail, not details). Also, the
details field in Gecko can be a string, or
>
> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Nicholas Nethercote <
> n.netherc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On the other hand, I'm more optimistic than bholley about the per-bug
> >> delegation. Given that it's been implemented I'd suggest using it and
> >> if reviewers do tend to forget it then consider
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Lars Bergstrom wrote:
> I've been assuming the only time that we would use `delegate` is for
> people like you (Bobby), whom we trust, but who have not gone through
> the process to become a Servo reviewer.
5 matches
Mail list logo
