I've been playing with crypto.signText for a couple of weeks in the
hopes of using it to build web front-ends for XML-Signature
applications.
At this stage, technically, it all works fine, aside from one annoying
quibble, which is that mozilla wants a certificate to use as the signing
identity for
Jay Potter wrote:
> Can a PKCS#11 module be proprietary? I would not want to publicize the
> intricacies of the USB device, but rather provide a mechanism where
> others could utilize its capabilities within their own projects.
Yes, the whole point of PKCS#11 is to allow makers of proprietary cr
Hello Bob,
Thank you for your reply.
Bob Relyea wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hello,
I am using Mozilla applications for a long time I enjoy it, but the
PKCS#11 implementation always worried me.
1. It prompts for PIN every time the token is accessed (Does not use
the public objects if exists
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hello,
I am using Mozilla applications for a long time I enjoy it, but the
PKCS#11 implementation always worried me.
1. It prompts for PIN every time the token is accessed (Does not use
the public objects if exists).
This is probably because the token does not keep it's l
Jay Potter wrote:
Can a PKCS#11 module be proprietary?
Yes. As far as I know most if not all PKCS#11 modules for real-life
hardware tokens are distributed under proprietary licenses in binary
form only. The Mozilla source code used in, e.g., Firefox is made
available under the Mozilla Public
Nelson B wrote:
Umesh Bywar wrote:
Hi all:
Welcome to the list, Umesh.
I am working on writing an xpcom component that checks which ciphers
work with a given target. So basically, I have a component which acts as
a SSL client and performs a handshake by setting a given cipher.
Nelson B wrote:
Jay Potter wrote:
Nelson,
We are planning on using a USB device that has keys for various vendors
in a "private" area. The USB device can generate a session key based
upon that secret vendor key. The Server can autogenerate that same
session key. The session key does not hav
Rodrigo Parente wrote:
Hello, sorry for my english...
I´m new at web developing and i need to know how to sign data and documents
from Firefox using my certificate stored in a Alladin etoken. I´ve already
installed the PKCS#11 module and i can login into the token from firefox,
but i don´t know
Hello,
I am using Mozilla applications for a long time I enjoy it,
but the PKCS#11 implementation always worried me.
1. It prompts for PIN every time the token is accessed (Does
not use the public objects if exists).
2. It does not prompt for token insert if the token is
unavailable. For exa
Hello, sorry for my english...
I´m new at web developing and i need to know how to sign data and documents
from Firefox using my certificate stored in a Alladin etoken. I´ve already
installed the PKCS#11 module and i can login into the token from firefox,
but i don´t know how to make the firefox a
2817-style upgrades were added to mod_ssl I think purely as a
well-intentioned (but perhaps naive) attempt to solve the SSL vs
name-based virtual hosting problem, which is something we see Apache
users ask for, and get confused by, almost daily. I agree it is
basically useless: you didn't ment
11 matches
Mail list logo