Re: encrypt with firefox (and other mozilla browsers)

Hello Carlos, I don't claim to be the authority on this, but you can read the last three messages of this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.crypto/browse_thread/thread/298e0723330e9697 >From what Anders and Kyle say, I get the impression that signText is the only functional

Browser Crypto Redux. Was: New method for linking smart cards to web browsers

>Anders Rundgren wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/axalto-paper.html >> >> This paper says that we can soon forget about P11 and such >> and rely on AJAX-like access to crypto. >We wouldn't have to worry about vendor-independent crypto device >interface standards if everyone in the world would

Re: pkcs#7 envelopeddata decoding

> I did try to decode the structure using the CMS routines, but they > also give me the exact same garbled output... > Not a signeddata structure as I would have expected, but the same > output never the less... So I expect this is a lower level problem > (not > the API used), I just can't find out

Re: NSS Cache question

Rob Crittenden wrote: > I'm having an issue with mod_nss, an Apache module I wrote that provides > SSL using NSS. > > The way Apache loads modules is a tad strange. I'd say it's more than a tad! > What it does is it loads them one time in order to get its list of > configuration directives and