Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
Why would you like to use the CFB mode?
Because that's what the current (non-NSS) code does. I'd rather just
port, not change, the code.
Is the CFB mode used in your implementation of some standard?
Just curious.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
Why would you like to use the CFB mode?
Because that's what the current (non-NSS) code does. I'd rather just
port, not change, the code.
Is the CFB mode used in your implementation of
Nelson,
Thanks a lot for your helps.
Now I have found and fixed my problem. It comes from a CKA_VALUE
checking, not from the CKA_ID checking.
Nelson B wrote:
ben wrote:
In my case both the attributes CKA_ID and CKA_LABEL are set to a same
unique name regardless whether the cert subject
Hi there,
I am running a Client-side SSL connection using Firefox browser 1.5. I
found a problem with it is the SSL caching. Open an FF browser and
started a Client-side SSL connection to a web server. It's fine.
Now I want to open a different SSL connection with a different user
account and
ben wrote:
Hi there,
I am running a Client-side SSL connection using Firefox browser 1.5. I
found a problem with it is the SSL caching. Open an FF browser and
started a Client-side SSL connection to a web server. It's fine.
Now I want to open a different SSL connection with a different user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would you like to use the CFB mode?
Because that's what the current (non-NSS) code does. I'd rather just
port, not change, the code.
Is the CFB mode used in your implementation of some standard?
Just curious.
No, it is not a standard.
But it is used by SNMP
Peter Djalaliev wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about something I don't understand in the SSL
implementation of NSS.
When ssl_Do1stHandshake is called, it checks three handshake function
pointers in the sslSocket struct: handshake, nextHandshake and
securityHandshake. What is the
Kaspar Brand wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315871
Would it make sense to create a separate bug entry for the getPKCS7()
patch, since this is actually a backend-only thing?
Kaspar, let me suggest that you write to Kai and ask him directly how
to proceed.
--
Nelson B
8 matches
Mail list logo