Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
> 3.) Here a few questions in relation to the LiteSSL CPS:
In reference to this, it's not clear to me whether Comodo still issues
LiteSSL certificates or not. Note that the LiteSSL CPS Addendum is an
addendum to version 2.4 of the Comodo CPS. However the current
Nelson Bolyard:
> Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote, On 2008-03-15 13:27 PDT:
>
>> 3.) Here a few questions in relation to the LiteSSL CPS:
>>
>> * 1.12 states: "Because LiteSSL and LiteSSL Wildcard certificates
>> are not intended to be used in an e-commerce transaction or
>> envi
Nelson Bolyard:
> Well, presumably, the wildcard certs they issue are valid for multiple
> names within the domain that they validated only. The then rely on
> the subject party to use the certs only in the servers that they control
> in that domain. But that last statement is true of all CAs. A
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote, On 2008-03-15 13:27 PDT:
> 3.) Here a few questions in relation to the LiteSSL CPS:
>
> * 1.12 states: "Because LiteSSL and LiteSSL Wildcard certificates
> are not intended to be used in an e-commerce transaction or
> environment, parties who rely o
I have the following questions concerning the Comodo inclusion and
upgrade requests. I'd be glad if the representative of Comodo could
answer them directly.
1.) Is it possible to get a list of the currently active issuing
intermediate CA certificates of each CA root *currently* for
considerati
Andrew Groom wrote, On 2008-03-12 20:16:
> I seem to be having a problem with signtool from NSS 3.10 in that it's
> not respecting any quoting of certificate names with spaces in them, e.g.:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:vortex$ ./bin/signtool -d ./my_cert_database -k "My New
> Certificate" -p 'blah' .
6 matches
Mail list logo
