Benjamin Smedberg wrote, On 2009-03-30 07:25:
> On 3/30/09 4:00 AM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>
>> On Windows, the JEMalloc code can ONLY be built with the non-free
>> "professional" version of Microsoft Visual Studio, and CANNOT be built
>> with the free version. Consequently, developers who use t
Neil wrote, On 2009-03-30 02:10:
> Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>
>> Neil wrote, On 2009-03-29 17:01:
>>
>>
>>> Firefox may want to switch to using the jemalloc allocator on the
>>> Mac.
>>>
>>>
>> Well, I hope it won't mean for the Mac what it has meant on Windows.
>>
>> On Windows, the JEMalloc
On 3/30/09 4:00 AM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> On Windows, the JEMalloc code can ONLY be built with the non-free
> "professional" version of Microsoft Visual Studio, and CANNOT be built
> with the free version. Consequently, developers who use the free version
> must build EVERYTHING themselves, a
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
Neil wrote, On 2009-03-29 17:01:
Firefox may want to switch to using the jemalloc allocator on the Mac.
Well, I hope it won't mean for the Mac what it has meant on Windows.
On Windows, the JEMalloc code can ONLY be built with the non-free
"professional" versio
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> Putting a non-legal name in the CN is absolutely NOT a correct
> implementation. That rightfully belongs in the "Organization" field,
> not the common name.
Do you have any standard document proving that statement? Up to now I
thought that commonName (coming from the X.500
Neil wrote, On 2009-03-29 17:01:
> Firefox may want to switch to using the jemalloc allocator on the Mac.
Well, I hope it won't mean for the Mac what it has meant on Windows.
On Windows, the JEMalloc code can ONLY be built with the non-free
"professional" version of Microsoft Visual Studio, and
6 matches
Mail list logo
