On 22/10/2010 19:07, Brian Smith wrote:
> Speaking only for myself, I have no objection to offering the mp_int
> bignum API as a "public" API out of freebl3.
If people are open to having the J-PAKE building blocks in FreeBL,
then we wouldn't need MPI to be part of the public API. The main conc
On 23. 10. 2010 22:18, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
On 2010-10-21 13:31 PDT, Matej Kurpel wrote:
This looks like Thunderbird cannot find the user certificate in its
database. Well, it shouldn't anyway, since it resides on the token
provided by a PKCS#11 module I am developing.
Right. It's not nece
On 2010-10-24 02:12 PDT, Matej Kurpel wrote:
[snip]
> You can clearly see both my CA and user certificates. Certutil has used
> my PKCS#11 module to obtain my user certificate. Then I launched the
> second commany you were suggesting:
>
> certutil -d . -L -n "HTC Touch HD T8282:Matej Kurpel"
>
"Jean-Marc Desperrier" wrote:
> The reference I gave before shows that there is now a widely accepted
> opinion that SRP does not infringe on patent more than J-PAKE (even if
> there was indeed that doubt a few years ago).
>
> A patent that covers SRP might be found, but it does not appear toda
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> [...]
> I'm talking about putting JBAKE (or whatever it is) into the base product.
> [...]
Is there something specific about J-PAKE that you think is bad or worse than
some alternative? Are you objecting to J-PAKE because you do not trust the
proofs of security given
5 matches
Mail list logo
