> Maybe because the removal wasn't proposed at that time? Now there is a > proposal to remove something that has no working (not even standardized) > successor. Also, people using this stuff are really far away from W3C.
Firefox had a competitive advantage in supporting this. It would have been wise to keep it until a satisfying replacement was ready. Look at: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1083118 Regards. -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
