Re: Firefox? Re: Secret Storage API specification project

2009-07-13 Thread Anders Rundgren
Ian G wrote: On 12/7/09 21:58, Anders Rundgren wrote: Nelson B Bolyard wrote: On 2009-07-12 05:51 PDT, Anders Rundgren wrote: This is an interesting project. What's not completely obvious is how this relates (or could relate) to for example Firefox. I must confess that I know absolutely

Firefox? Re: Secret Storage API specification project

2009-07-12 Thread Anders Rundgren
This is an interesting project. What's not completely obvious is how this relates (or could relate) to for example Firefox. I must confess that I know absolutely nothing about NSS but I assume that the soft-token uses obfuscation and an *optional* password as the sole protection mechanism.

Re: [Authentication] Firefox? Re: Secret Storage API specification project

2009-07-12 Thread Michael Leupold
On Sunday 12 July 2009 14:51:43 Anders Rundgren wrote: This is an interesting project. What's not completely obvious is how this relates (or could relate) to for example Firefox. I CCed Mozilla developers because this project would enable them to use this daemon for storing their secrets in

Re: Firefox? Re: Secret Storage API specification project

2009-07-12 Thread Nelson B Bolyard
On 2009-07-12 05:51 PDT, Anders Rundgren wrote: This is an interesting project. What's not completely obvious is how this relates (or could relate) to for example Firefox. I must confess that I know absolutely nothing about NSS but I assume that the soft-token uses obfuscation and an

Re: Firefox? Re: Secret Storage API specification project

2009-07-12 Thread Ian G
On 12/7/09 21:58, Anders Rundgren wrote: Nelson B Bolyard wrote: On 2009-07-12 05:51 PDT, Anders Rundgren wrote: This is an interesting project. What's not completely obvious is how this relates (or could relate) to for example Firefox. I must confess that I know absolutely nothing about NSS