Brendan Eich wrote:
Dave Mandelin wrote:
IIUC, this isn't a regression. It's a test that has never worked
consistently across platforms.
It used to, AFAIK. The test dates from 2009 (pre-hg, it's in
cvs.mozilla.org). I don't recall it ever failing like this, or anyone
reporting such a failure
Dave Mandelin wrote:
IIUC, this isn't a regression. It's a test that has never worked
consistently across platforms.
It used to, AFAIK. The test dates from 2009 (pre-hg, it's in
cvs.mozilla.org). I don't recall it ever failing like this, or anyone
reporting such a failure.
Seems we do have
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 9:54:33 AM UTC-7, Brendan Eich wrote:
> Terrence Cole wrote:
>
> > On 10/17/2012 10:01 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
>
> >> Terrence and I have had problems with that one before. IIRC the test
> >> has some bogosity about it, but I don't remember the details --
>
On 10/18/2012 09:54 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>
> Terrence Cole wrote:
>> On 10/17/2012 10:01 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
>>> Terrence and I have had problems with that one before. IIRC the test
>>> has some bogosity about it, but I don't remember the details --
>>> Terrence, do you?
>>
>> I'll
Terrence Cole wrote:
On 10/17/2012 10:01 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
Terrence and I have had problems with that one before. IIRC the test
has some bogosity about it, but I don't remember the details --
Terrence, do you?
I'll just echo what Nicolas said: anything that changes the interpre
On 10/17/2012 10:01 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>> $ ./Darwin_DBG.OBJ/js -f tests/shell.js -f tests/js1_8/shell.js -f
>> tests/js1_8/genexps/shell.js -f tests/js1_8/genexps/regress-380237-01.js -
>> BUGNUMBER: 380237
>> STATUS: Generator ex
6 matches
Mail list logo
