Re: [JS-internals] Gecko340xxx SpiderMonkey JIT only?

2014-12-10 Thread Jason Orendorff
On 12/10/2014 03:29 PM, Jason Hill wrote: That sounds nice though. One another big change looks like there is no String to Value conversion anymore. I'd use to keep jsval references for everything since it was easy to switch into other types. Any details on this highly appreciated. `JS::Valu

Re: [JS-internals] Gecko340xxx SpiderMonkey JIT only?

2014-12-10 Thread Jason Hill
That sounds nice though. One another big change looks like there is no String to Value conversion anymore. I'd use to keep jsval references for everything since it was easy to switch into other types. Any details on this highly appreciated. ___ dev-te

Re: [JS-internals] Gecko340xxx SpiderMonkey JIT only?

2014-12-10 Thread Nicolas B. Pierron
On 12/10/2014 03:58 AM, jamesjasonh...@gmail.com wrote: Hey! I just saw a significant update (comparing to Gecko300XXX) that lots of source files from /jit folder included into regular build. Does this mean 'no interpreter only' build anymore ? No, we still have interpreter-only, the main dif