On 2016-05-12 9:53 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
> The more we empower people for working only on their domain(s) of
> expertise, the less we would have need for such heroes. Having persons
> responsible for the integration would help us on that.
As someone who has worked on many parts of the bro
On 05/11/2016 06:31 PM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron <
nicolas.b.pier...@mozilla.com> wrote:
If the problem are the pointless arguments on dev.platform, which are
mistakenly considering SpiderMonkey as Gecko's property, I would totally
agree on movin
Agreed to everything Bill said.
When it comes to the styling discussion, I don't really care about
using one style or the other. I didn't like SM style at first, and now
I am so used to it that I naturally use it everywhere (Stockholm
syndrome?).
What I do care about though is to be able to autom
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron <
nicolas.b.pier...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 02:15 AM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
>
>> instead go with Terrence’s suggestion and simply adopt the same style as
>>> the rest of Gecko, including the 2-space indent.
>>>
>>>
>> I've said befor
My first 1 or 2 years at Mozilla I spent entirely working on
Spidermonkey. I was happy with it, and I even joked that I never
wanted to work on the browser proper because compile times were so
long compared the to JS shell.
But eventually I branched out and worked on other components, and I'm
glad
5 matches
Mail list logo
