+code+from+an+existing+project
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> How can I make a own repository entry or fork which doesn't
> disturb someone on GitHub. I think this should be a good plac
Hello,
now I've commited a version with the failure I described bevore.
I implement it in the following way:
jswrapper.cpp:
bool
CrossCompartmentWrapper::isTransparent(JSContext *cx, HandleObject
wrapper, bool *bp)
{
return Wrapper::isTransparent(cx, wrapper, bp);
}
I use the following fu
cess = ToBoolean(trapResult);
// step 6
*bp = success;
return true;
}
How can I retrieve the proxy handler to get the data from the trap?
Thanks a lot
Andreas
Am 16.01.2014 14:31, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.
Yes it is a clone of mozilla-central, but if I create an empty
repository and upload the data, is the history also uploaded?
If I import an repository I can only import it over an URL, not locally.
___
dev-tech-js-engine-internals mailing list
dev-tech-js
la isn't all that bad
> either, though.
>
> In any case, without being able to look at (and apply) a patch, it's
> hard to tell what's going on.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Andreas Schlegel
> mail
&trapResult))
return false;
// step 5
bool success = ToBoolean(trapResult);
// step 6
*bp = success;
return true;
}
The error occurs during the call of Invoke. How can I solve this?
Thanks a lot
Am 14.01.2014 20:27, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
> On Tue, Jan 14,
uch, much easier and quicker
> that way.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I see the wrapper class is a child of the DirectProxyHandler,
> which I haven't changed until now. Should I chan
I see the wrapper class is a child of the DirectProxyHandler, which I
haven't changed until now. Should I change only this class or the
underlying wrapper?
Am 14.01.2014 19:52, schrieb Andreas Schlegel:
> Hello Till,
>
> I think the first answer of my question could be in an other
e the CrossCompartmentWrapper?
Am 14.01.2014 19:46, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> My Questions are:
>
> Why is the proxy within the global not handled by a
> Scri
t.
My Questions are:
Why is the proxy within the global not handled by a
ScriptedDirectProxyHandler and which handler is used for?
Why are the JSContext and JSRuntime identical, although the two objects
should use two different Runtimes?
Thanks a lot
Andreas
Am 14.01.2014 14:18, schrieb Andreas Sch
:34, schrieb Andreas Schlegel:
> Ok thank you I will test it.
>
> Am 12.01.2014 15:30, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Andreas Schlegel
>> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know your code, so thi
Ok thank you I will test it.
Am 12.01.2014 15:30, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> I don't know your code, so this is somewhat speculative, but: if
>> you create
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Andreas Schlegel
Am 12.01.2014 13:35, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>> Regardless of the threading stuff, objects don't belong to
>
Am 11.01.2014 19:28, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> >> If I have a multi-threaded application and the object has
>> an other
>> >>
Am 11.01.2014 18:16, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > Contexts and threads don't have much to do with each other. If you
> > ignore a couple of things, a
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Andreas Schlegel
Am 10.01.2014 20:27, schrieb Steve Fink:
> On Fri 10 Jan 2014 01:52:55 AM PST, Andreas Schlegel wrote:
>> Hello Steve,
>>
>> thank you for your reply.
>>
>> Am 09.01.2014 21:47, schrieb Steve Fink:
>>> On 0
Hello Steve,
thank you for your reply.
Am 09.01.2014 21:47, schrieb Steve Fink:
> On 01/06/2014 09:25 AM, Andreas Schlegel wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I need the JSContext to declare JS::RootedObjects or Values.
>> Especially for the case of WeakMap/Map/Set-Hasher I
Hello,
I need the JSContext to declare JS::RootedObjects or Values.
Especially for the case of WeakMap/Map/Set-Hasher I don't have the
JSContext.
At the moment I use the following implementation to get the JSContext
(this is a code snipped of a hash-function):
JSRuntime * rt = JS_GetObjectRuntim
Hi,
I use your notation with ==1 for distinguish different contract wrappers
of same function or in my case object target and ==2 for considering
different contract wrappers of the same function or in my case object
target to be identical.
We use JavaScript proxies for implementing access permiss
/source/dom/browser-element/BrowserElementParent.jsm#78
>
> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/ctypes/tests/unit/head.js#26
>
> Andrew
>
>>
>> cheers,
>> till
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Andreas Schlegel
this function?
Thanks a lot
Andreas
Am 29.12.2013 15:18, schrieb Till Schneidereit:
> There is: nondeterministicGetWeakMapKeys, defined in
> TestingFunctions.cpp. It's only available in the shell, though.
>
>
> cheers,
> till
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2
Hello,
is there any possibility to iterate through all entries of a WeakMap, or
to get all key objects of a weakmap for testing purposes from JavaScript?
Thanks a lot
Andreas
Am 27.12.2013 17:29, schrieb Andreas Schlegel:
> Hello,
>
> I've found another hash policy for
Hello,
I'm glad to see, that someone will help to carry this thematic forward
:-), thank you.
At the moment I've implemented an Handler trap for the
ScriptedDirectProxies, which is used for the StriclyEqual and
LooselyEqual operations in the Interpreter.cpp. These functions are
mostly used for the
all answers.
Thanks
Andreas
Am 27.12.2013 17:04, schrieb Andreas Schlegel:
> Hello,
>
> I've tested some options the last time to get my code running, but
> with every variation of the Hasher I get the same error messages
> during compile time.
>
> One of the impl
h the type conversation, but I'm able
to find the error.
I've tested also, if the functions for getting the JSContext are wrong
or make the error but if I implement only stubs which compare the given
values the error occurs too.
Can anyone help me to implement the Hasher for the WeakMa
ObjectValue(*handler), trap, 0, argv, &trapResult))
return false;
...
}
How can I get here the needed JSContext?
Thanks a lot
Andreas
Am 20.12.2013 18:07, schrieb Andreas Schlegel:
> Hello,
>
> thank you for your answer.
>
> First I will change the WeakMap.
>
> I
of hash() and match()?
Thanks a lot
Andreas
Am 19.12.2013 19:58, schrieb Jason Orendorff:
> On 12/19/13 3:21 AM, Andreas Schlegel wrote:
>> Hello Jason,
>>
>> for comparing "transparent" proxies I have to change some things for
>> WeakMap Map and Set.
>>
ith asBits comparisms too?
Best regards
Andreas
Am 17.12.2013 23:56 schrieb "Jason Orendorff" :
> On 12/17/13 5:51 AM, Andreas Schlegel wrote:
> > The problem is, that in the HashableValue::operator==() function the
> > Context cx was given as nullptr to SameValue():
>
Hello,
is this perhaps a bug or failure:
JS_ASSERT(SameValue(nullptr, value, other.value, &same));
How can I retrieve the JSContext for declaring RootedObjects, if the
parent function is called with a nullptr as value for JSContext?
Thanks
Andreas
Am 17.12.2013 12:51, schrieb Andreas Schl
How can I create a RootedObject without JSContext, e.g as attribute for
Proxy::isTransparent() or in
ScriptedDirectProxyHandler::isTransparent() for the direkt proxy?
Best regards
Andreas
Am 16.12.2013 14:57, schrieb Jason Orendorff:
> On 12/14/13 5:29 AM, Andreas Schlegel wrote:
>> Hello,
how can I fix it?
Can you explain me why more than one comparisms is called?
I see in the shell code there is a loop for all properties of the
objects which compares the names to !==. Is the second call the
"assertSameValue" function? And why does it fail?
Best Regards
Andrea
ssage for this code?
Best regards
Andreas Schlegel
Am 13.12.2013 17:43, schrieb Jason Orendorff:
> On 12/13/13 9:59 AM, Andreas Schlegel wrote:
>> Hello Jason,
>>
>> can you explain me the followin test case of the JIT-Tests:
>> self-test/assertDeepEq.js:
>>
>>
Hello,
because of the two different discussion threads, it is possible that
some informations were hidden in this thread.
I'm a student at the university of Freiburg and I'm writing my Master
Thesis with this thematic. At the moment this is only a research field.
The work will eventually get part
debating) is going to really improve things.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Andreas Schlegel
> mailto:schlegel.andr...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Tom,
>
> you're right I'm wor
p);
>> }
>>
>> How can I integrate the new trap into the proxy?
>> I've found the "const Class js::ObjectProxyObject::class_" must I
>> do an new entry for the trap?
>>
>>
>> Second Question:
>> -
T. S. Strickland, S. Tobin-Hochstadt, R. B. Findler, and M. Flatt.
Chaperones and impersonators: run-time support for reasonable interposition. In
OOPSLA, pages 943–962. ACM, 2012.
proxy.dvi
-Peter Thiemann
Best regards
Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013 15:19:33 UTC+1 schrieb Brendan Eich:
> And
Hello Jason,
thank you for the explaination and answering my questions.
I understand you. If the proxies differ in behavior, they should not be
transparent. But for our case we have multiple proxies representing the same
target, only with different contracts. These contracts should e.g. give
d
e for this case?
Best regards
Andreas
Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013 21:15:26 UTC+1 schrieb Mark S. Miller:
> Why not use the identity-preserving membrane pattern?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Andreas Schlegel <
>
> schlegel.andr...@gmail.
this case?
Best regards
Andreas
Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013 21:15:26 UTC+1 schrieb Mark S. Miller:
> Why not use the identity-preserving membrane pattern?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Andreas Schlegel <
>
> schlegel.andr...@gmail.
39 matches
Mail list logo
